Client context
An online store managed by a Ukrainian tax resident used a dropshipping model to sell to customers in the United States, the European Union and Australia.
E-commerce · Published scope only
Global payment architecture for a dropshipping business
Comparing merchant, operating and holding routes for online sales across the United States, Europe and Australia.
Material challenge
Payment-provider restrictions for Ukrainian companies, the absence of a coordinated tax model and questions around lawful profit distribution had to be reviewed together.
Publication note
Client and counterparty identifiers are withheld. This publication covers the agreed context, scope and approach only; it does not claim an independently verified outcome.
01 / Scope
What the published scope covered
- Map storefronts, merchant accounts, suppliers and settlement flows
- Review payment-provider eligibility and onboarding dependencies
- Compare operating and holding roles across jurisdictions
- Assess owner-level tax and distribution considerations
02 / Method
How the work was organised
Considered Estonia, the United States and the UAE for distinct functional roles
Tested the options against customer geography and provider requirements
Documented governance, reporting and implementation questions for local validation
Payments · companies · banking
Money Flow
Start with a short, non‑confidential brief.
Include the relevant jurisdictions and the decision you need to make. The team will identify the appropriate direction and reply by email.